Differences between Dissent and Verbal Abuse

Dissent is committed by words, actions (including gestures), or a combination of the two. The referee should evaluate dissent in terms of content (what exactly is said or done), loudness (the extent to which the dissent can be seen or heard widely), and whether it is clearly directed at an official (including assistant referees and fourth officials). The objective in dealing with dissent is to support the spirit of the game, to maintain the authority of the officials, and to reduce the likelihood of such behavior becoming widespread. A goalkeeper who leaves the penalty area (not beckoned by the referee) to engage the referee or an assistant referee in debate regarding a decision has committed dissent.

Referee abuse is a verbal statement or physical act not resulting in bodily contact that implies or threatens physical harm to a referee or the referee ’s property or equipment.  Abuse includes, but is not limited to the following acts committed upon a referee: using foul or abusive language toward a referee; spewing any beverage on a re f e re e ’s personal property; spitting at (but not on) the referee; or verbally threatening a referee.  Verbal threats are remarks that carry the implied or direct threat of physical harm. Such remarks as “I’ll get you after the game” or “You won’t get out of here in one piece,” shall be deemed referee abuse.

While a referee may feel that remarks directed at him/her may be abusive, unless there is a implied threat of physical harm, the term “abusive” should not be used in your Game Report as you will be required to attach a detailed written report with the Game Report to support the League in determining that a three game suspension (as required by the USSF for the offending individual) is warranted.